By Jenna Tynan, HLS Class of 2016 –
Multiple commentators have weighed in on the relative boon or bust of the long-awaited Obamacare implementation. Both perspectives, however, have shown that any legislation’s impact is determined not only by the text of the act but also by the parties affected. A recent personal experience at the doctor’s office demonstrates the reactionary impact of legislation. After determining that I had a common eye infection well treated by oral antibiotics, the physicians chose a different antibiotic regimen, referring to their inability to dispense the antibiotic for fear that I may be pregnant. I firmly vouched that I was not pregnant, but the physicians responded that they would like to take my word but could not do so.
At first, I thought that antibiotic manufacturers were now taking the paternalistic approach that isotretinoin (acne medication) producers have taken. Isotretinoin producers now require patients, pharmacists, and physicians to join the iPledge program to prevent pregnancy during medication ingestion. However, my physicians’ prescribing choice was not driven by such a formalized program, but the combination of a labeling restriction promulgated in 2013 and, as I opine, fear of medical malpractice suits. The particular regulations on their face … Read More »
By Kellen Wittkop, HLS Class of 2016 –
College students navigate a constant balancing act of managing the many stresses that accompany enrollment at any institution of higher learning: classes, activities, job searches, etc. But one of the largest causes of anxiety for students is something that often looms largely in the shadows – debt. According to American Student Assistance, a non-profit organization that promotes itself as a “nonprofit you can rely on for neutral, honest student loan solutions,” of the approximate 20 million students in attendance each year, 60% (12 million) of those students borrow annually to cover costs of their education. Estimates from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and the Consumer Finance Protection Bureau (CFPB) put outstanding student loan debt in the range of $902 billion to $1 trillion. See full statistics here.
Some members of Congress have recognized this problem and have taken action. In late December 2013, a group of Democratic senators – led in large part by former Harvard Law professor Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass. – announced a package of bills aimed largely at giving student loan borrowers greater rights, now officially titled the “Student Loan Borrower Bill of Rights” (see http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d113:s1803: for full text … Read More »
Join the Journal on Legislation for its annual Symposium, “Drug Policy: Reality and Reform.” There will be two panels, which will consist of short speeches, debate between panelists, and a question and answer session. Panera lunch will be provided at both panels!
The first panel discussion, held on Tuesday, February 11th at 12 noon in WCC 1015, will focus on the relationship between drug policies and mass incarceration. The speakers on the first panel will be:
Barbara Dougan, Massachusetts Project Director at Families Against Mandatory Minimums (FAMM)
Nancy Gertner, Professor of Practice at Harvard Law School
Mark Osler, Professor of Law at University of St. Thomas Law School
John Pfaff, Associate Professor of Law at Fordham Law School
The second panel discussion, held on Wednesday, February 12th at 12 noon in WCC 1015, will focus on the possibility of ending marijuana prohibition. The speakers on the second panel will be:
Senator John Keenan, Massachusetts State Senator for the Norfolk and Plymouth district
Ethan Nadelmann, Founder and Executive Director of the Drug Policy Alliance
Charles “Cully” Stimson, Senior Legal Fellow at the Heritage Foundation
We will also be showing “The House I Live in” on February 11th at 5 p.m. in WCC 2009, and dinner will be provided. Please join these … Read More »
By Tyler Anderson, HLS Class of 2014 –
Over the past several months, Congress has generated considerable outrage regarding the NSA’s collection of data from foreign officials. http://www.lawfareblog.com/2013/10/skepticism-about-supposed-white-house-and-intelligence-committees-ignorance-about-nsa-collection-against-allied-leaders/. Some of this criticism is surely deserved; for example, we recently learned that the NSA spied on Ban Ki-moon’s talking points before Ban’s meeting with President Obama to discuss, among other things, global climate change, http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/03/world/no-morsel-too-minuscule-for-all-consuming-nsa.html?pagewanted=1&nl=todaysheadlines&emc=edit_th_20131103 — Moon is not the sort of existential threat toward which the NSA should be dedicating its resources.
Nevertheless, the outrage generated by international spying domestically – and particularly by Congress – largely misses the problems generated by NSA surveillance that is both secret and expansive. Here, the history of intelligence surveillance reform is instructive. The original Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act and the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act Amendments Act (FAA) strongly distinguished between surveillance conducted on foreigners compared to surveillance conducted on Americans. See Tyler C. Anderson, Toward Institutional Reform of Intelligence Surveillance: A Proposal to Amend the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, 8.2 Harv. L. & Pol. Rev. __ (2014) (forthcoming). While some of this tailoring is due to Constitutional (primarily 4th Amendment) constraints, it is important to remember that Congress put the policy of limiting surveillance … Read More »
By Jenna Tynan, HLS Class of 2016 –
Imagine you’re a first-year associate and after your standard fourteen-hour workday, you sit back and indulge in a product recently found more addictive than cocaine: the iconic Oreo. You rush back to work the next morning with a wayward Oreo stain on your favorite blazer only to end yet another long day…with a pink slip!?! You violated the firm’s categorical ban on Oreo consumption promulgated to reduce diabetic healthcare costs believed to rise with sugar consumption. Luckily for this author, no employer has banned recreational Oreo consumption, but America’s over 43 million smokers aren’t so fortunate. Healthcare industries, city municipalities and airlines have banned hiring prospective candidates who smoke or use tobacco products citing controlling costs and presenting a “healthy” image for their rationale. These employers may be justified in their decision given the new “tax” for not proving health benefits to all employees. However, employer regulation, and especially government employer regulation, of what happens in an employee’s home seems to conflict with those penumbral privacy rights cherished and protected by our judicial system.
As a result, twenty-nine states and the District of Columbia have enacted “smoker protection laws,” which prohibit various forms … Read More »